Paradigma Baru dalam KUHP 2023: Tinjauan Politik Hukum dan Analisis Kebahasaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v4i5.1220Abstract
The enactment of Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code (KUHP) marks a new phase in the nation’s legal history. This reform does not merely replace colonial penal provisions but represents a paradigm shift toward a more humanistic and nationally oriented system of justice. This study examines the reform through two lenses: legal politics and linguistic analysis. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach, it explores both the normative substance of the new KUHP and the linguistic features that reflect a progressive legal ideology. Findings indicate that the reform embodies Indonesia’s legal decolonization by shifting the philosophy of punishment from retribution to restoration. Linguistically, the new KUHP demonstrates more communicative, inclusive, and persuasive patterns in diction, syntax, and pragmatics, transforming the law into a discursive medium that fosters public awareness. Legal language designed to be more communicative, precise, and participatory, embodying substantive justice and Pancasila values.
Downloads
References
Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A. M. (2017). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Keempat). Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa
Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana Prenada Media.
Aris, A. (2023). Politik Hukum dan Pembaruan KUHP Nasional. Jakarta: Badilum Press.
Asbari, M., Emilia, S., & Andini, M. (2022). Pancasila as a Paradigm of Legal Development in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 9(1), 33–42.
Asbari, M., Novitasari, D., & Wijaya, M. R. (2021). Effect of Organizational Justice on Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Management Research, 6(2), 88–97.
Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, P. B. (2020). Paradigma riset pendidikan: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 123–135.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaer, A. (2012). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. (2022). Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2023, Juli 10). Paradigma baru pemidanaan, politik hukum, dan asas-asas pembaruan dalam KUHP Nasional 2023 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69jyuOM8FP0
Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kridalaksana, H. (2011). Pembentukan kata dalam bahasa Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2024). Podium Badilum: Paradigma Baru KUHP Nasional. Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California: Sage Publications.
Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2021). Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan (PSHK). (2023). Laporan Kajian Literasi Hukum di Indonesia Tahun 2023. Jakarta: PSHK Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Kompas.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta:
Duta Wacana University Press.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Irma Lida Arni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
