THE Effect of Short-Term and Long-Term Learning in Quality Management and Innovation

Siti Patmawati; Valin Mertianti Dewi; Masduki Asbari

doi:10.4444/jisma.v2i1.249

Authors

Siti Patmawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Insan Pembangunan
Valin Mertianti Dewi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Insan Pembangunan
Masduki Asbari STMIK Insan Pembangunan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v2i1.249

Abstract

Quality oriented management change and innovation is the main strategy for the company. The implementation of quality improvement and innovation has an organizational and managerial role significant technical, and may also involve significant delays before both are realized. In this literature study, we used a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Our study highlights the short-term and long-term beneficial effects of QIM (Quality improvement management) adoption on product innovation performance. In addition, we found evidence of complementarity and learning effects using QIM adoption. Results show that maximizing innovation returns and improving quality requires consideration of Soft and Hard properties Individual QIM and the timing and sequence of their application. In addition, we find evidence of complementarity and learning effects using QIM adoption. Our results suggest that maximizing innovation returns and improving quality requires the severity of individual QIM and the timing and sequence of their implementation .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes et al., (2006). Successful innovation requires that companies and managers provide clear and consistent signals to employees about the company's goals and objectives the company. J. Bus. 33, 119–135.

Bodas Freitas, IM, (2008). Sources of differences in the pattern of adoption of organizational

and managerial innovations from early to late 1990, in the UK. res. Policy 37.131–148.

Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., (2009). An investigation of the hard and soft quality management

factors of Australian SMEs and their association with firm performance. int. J. Qual.Reliab. Manag. 26, 865–880

Kartha, CP, (2004). A comparison of ISO 9000:2000 quality systems standards, QS 9000,

ISO/TS 16949 and baldridge criteria. TQM Mag. 16, 331–340.

Kaynak., (2003). The impact of QIM on companies, many experts conclude that TQM positively affects business performance. J. Opera. Manag. 20, 91–109

Mansury and Love., (2008). Importance of external sources for innovation output. J. Bus. 33, 119–135.

Martínez-Costa, M., Martínez-Lorente, AR, (2008). Does quality management foster or

hinder innovation? An empirical study of Spanish companies. Total Qual Manag. Buses. Excel. 19, 209–221.

Moura, E., Sá, P., Abrunhosa, A., (2007). The role of TQM practices in technological

innovation: the Portuguese footwear industry case. Total Qual. Manag . Buses. Excel. 18 57–66.

Pekovic, S., Gaul, F., (2009). From quality to innovation : evidence from two french

entrepreneur surveys. Technovation 29, 829–842.

Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Galende, J., (2009). An analysis of the relationship

between total quality management-based human resource management practices and innovation . int . J. Hum. resorts . Manag. 20, 1191–1218.

Roper et al., (2008). Innovation short-term effect before the long-term effect of the company's performance benefits Mid-Atlantic J. Bus. 33, 119–135.

Sadikoglu and Zehir (2010). Positive relationship between TQM and business performance. int. J. Prod.Res. 39, 43–63.

Sousa, R., Voss, CA, (2002). Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research. J. Opera. Manag. 20, 91–109

Todnem By, R., (2005). Organizational change management: a critical review . J. Change Manag. 5, 369–380.

Trott,. (2008). Quality control and evaluation techniques. in the UK. res. Policy 37.131–148.